Carrera 24 No. 34 - 61
(571) 6083605 - (571) 2327858
Bogotá, Colombia
info@dejusticia.org

Litigation

Intervention in motion for legal protection for the conformation of community action groups in San Lorenzo

Intervention in motion for legal protection of the right to equality and free development of personality of a transgenderist

Intervention in motion for legal protection on the issue of reparation to victims of forced displacement.

Intervention in motion for legal protection in order to carry out the process of consented adoption by a homosexual companion.

Intervention in the lawsuit against Articles 14 to 17 of Act 1335 of 2009.

Motion for legal protection due to a decree that restricts freedom of expression and access to information during presidential elections

Constitutional claim for victims of forced disappearance to be recognized as victims of political violence in order for them to have access to humanitarian aid.

Intervention in the writ against the Ministry of Transport and others for the violation of the fundamental right to prior consultation and territorial rights of the Embera Katío and Embera Dobida indegenous communities of Chidima Toló and Pescadito.

Intervention on the constitutionality of the declaration of the state of social emergency.

Amicus curiae in writ for the protection of fundamental rights that seeks to ensure the right to mental health of victims of forced displacement

Objection to the application of nullity of the decree that regulates the provision of services for voluntary interruption of pregnancyMayo 31 of 2010


Defendant: Decreto 4444 de 2006


Dejusticia requests the Council of State to refuse the application of nullity of the decree that regulates the provision of services for voluntary interruption of pregnancy. To this end, we argue that the Sentence C-355 of 2006, which decriminalized abortion in three cases, namely, when the continuation of pregnancy endangers life or health, when there is a serious malformation of the fetus that makes its life unviable, and when the pregnancy is the result of rape or artificial insemination, hit the health system when it recognized that pregnant women who are in any of the situations described above are entitled to access the service for voluntary interruption of pregnancy in healthy conditions. Under this impact on the health system, the National Government could exercise its regulatory powers in this case since Act 100 of 1993 establishes it is the competent authority to regulate the provision of health services.

 

Related Documents

  Complete document